It is difficult France to claim liberal

It is difficult, France, to claim liberal. The word scared and is used as a scarecrow. But what we fear, and that we refuse, we, young business leaders, the conservatism of all edges as the excesses of financial capitalism, who plays with our companies.

This is why we want to be the holders of a responsible liberalism which we try to draw the outlines for several years.

Which appears essential, liberalism, it is the idea of freedom, freedom of thought, to learn, to choose to act, to circulate, to undertake. But, in return, be responsible, it is the consequences of our actions, be able to correct our mistakes and, in so doing, the concern of others, of the world around us and future generations.

Deadlines electoral major for our country will take place in a few months. To avoid that, as too often in the past, entrepreneurial and economic issues are treated lightly, we participate in the discussion that they will generate, by submitting future candidates a number of concrete proposals. They will be declined according to five major axes:

Stop to oppose the economic necessities the rest: the economy is not the enemy of employment or the environment, culture or social justice. The overall performance of a company is instead an appropriate balance between these different areas. And the company is evidence to the contrary, the institution most suited to create wealth for the common prosperity. It will not win against it, and in particular SMEs, the battle of employment, it does maintain not without it our system of social protection.

Encouraging businesses to behave responsibly: number of business leaders believe in the virtues of this responsible for liberalism. But, face competition that embarrasses not of the same concerns, they cannot fully meet the criteria of social responsibility if this is truly recognized and accompanied by the State and individual consumers.

Invest on younger generations: it is unacceptable to let as many young people on the edge of the road at the risk of insult the survival of our country. We owe to better integrate them into our business, understand their expectations and gradually let them take control of a company that they have to invent and build. Our comfort can no longer rely on their depletion programmed by the enormity of our public debt, the refusal to reduce our spending or resolve our pension funding and our selfishness of polluters.

Environmental constraints make a new opportunity for development and innovation: it would be dangerous to address the decline of available resources and the fight against global warming in a Malthusian spirit. It should be seen as an opportunity of a questioning beneficial to our wasteful lifestyles along with the ability to innovate, develop clean and efficient technologies and creating new generating renewable growth markets.

Transition from mistrust to trust: State, businesses and unions are still not managed to be the "social partners" that they claim to be. Too systematic confrontation must give way to a participatory dynamic that has established a constructive social dialogue with the representatives of employees and a relationship of trust between business and administration.

The politicians running the presidential inauguration Gin cotton beads often opportunistic and sometimes contradictory proposals, which you never know how they will be funded, and how their effectiveness will be assessed. What we expect of them, is that they draw prospects for our country, for its citizens and companies, to five or ten years. Yes, they take a bit of height, that they leave their tactical calculations we propose a genuine strategic vision. They are evidence of responsibility to their constituents and freedom to their devices.